the supreme court of the united states is so far gone on ideology, robertson, he testified one way about congressional, following fact finding, they just disregarded a hundred years of precedent in psittacine united. one thing that has not been emphasized and knocked and maybe it will be in this campaign, but roe vs. wade is in jeopardy out there on c-span land. it is in jeopardy. when you have a 100 year precedents that unions cannot make political expenditures, and you have a 1990 case, where the supreme court of polls limitations and congress writes mccain, enacted into the law, and then the supreme court upholds it in 2003, and then, seven years later, you come along and with the flick of a pen, it is declared unconstitutional. there is no precedent that is safe. if, ideologically the court disagrees with it. that is a real problem. >> it is your term, return, folks -- to fund, folks -- taverna -- turn, folks. >> i like to the questions already because they have books in their hands. >> i am a member, i have been to washington four times. the governmental affairs committee, we have a